Ground Truth
All peptides

SS-31

Elamipretide, MTP-131, Bendavia, FORZINITY (brand name for Barth syndrome)

Checked Oct 28, 2026

GROUND TRUTH PEPTIDES · PEPTIDE FACTS

SS-31

Evidence grade for: Energy, recovery and longevity in healthy adults

D

No human evidence yet

  1. AProven
  2. BHuman trial
  3. CEarly data
  4. DNo human data

Best case for any use: A, Muscle strength in Barth syndrome (FDA accelerated approval).

CLAIMED, NOT PROVEN

People who are not sick take it hoping for more cellular energy, better recovery and slower aging.

WHAT HAS BEEN SHOWN

No trial has tested energy, recovery or longevity in healthy adults.

FDA STATUS

improving muscle strength in adult and pediatric patients with Barth syndrome weighing at least 30 kg (FDA accelerated approval, September 2025, Forzinity).

RISK

Injection-site reactions are the main effect; the label warns of serious hypersensitivity reactions, contraindicates use after one, and notes a rise in eosinophils.

DOSE

FDA label dose, Barth syndrome only: 40 mg once daily (20 mg with severe kidney impairment). Not a dose for any other use.

PLACEBO

No controlled trial for energy, recovery or longevity in healthy adults, so a placebo effect cannot be ruled out.

Information, not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before you act on it. Checked 2026-10-28. groundtruthpeptides.com

We tried it. This is what happened.

In 20 seconds

The grade

D

No human evidence yet

for energy, recovery and longevity in healthy adults. Result: not tested in humans

  1. AProven
  2. BHuman trial
  3. CEarly data
  4. DNo human data

Animal or lab work, a mechanism on paper, or anecdote. Nobody has tested it in people for this use yet.

ABest case for any use: muscle strength in Barth syndrome (FDA accelerated approval).

That does not carry over to energy, recovery or longevity in healthy adults. The approval rests on muscle strength in 8 people in an open-label extension; the randomized part of that trial did not beat placebo.

BSafety B: characterized. It is graded separately.

What do A to D mean? Tap to read

The letter says how far human testing has got for one use. It does not say how well the thing works. A tag next to it says what the trials found: worked, mixed, did not work, or not tested in humans. Every use is graded on its own, and safety has its own separate grade.

  • A

    Proven: proven in humans

    Shown in people. Two or more controlled human trials, or an FDA-approved use.

    Not a promise it works for you, or for any other use. Trials that missed their goal still count toward the letter; the result tag says what they found.

  • B

    Human trial: human-trial signal

    At least one controlled human trial. Real human data, but one trial is a signal, not a settled answer.

    Not proof. The trial may have been small, short or negative; read the result tag next to the letter.

  • C

    Early data: early human data

    Human reports only: small pilot studies or observational data. No controlled trial.

    Not tested against placebo, so a placebo effect cannot be ruled out.

  • D

    No human data: no human evidence yet

    Animal or lab work, a mechanism on paper, or anecdote. Nobody has tested it in people for this use yet.

    Not debunked, and not a fail. Animal results often fail in people, and this letter says nothing about whether it is safe.

The full method

Dose

The only approved dose is 40 mg once daily, by injection under the skin, for Barth syndrome (20 mg if the kidneys are severely impaired). That is the label dose for adults and children weighing at least 30 kg. No dose has been verified for healthy adults, so we print none for that use.

Reported by the named source, never prescribed by us.

Route
Subcutaneous injection (the label route)
Half-life
About 2 hours in blood after an injection; it may stay longer inside mitochondria
What the trials used
The label dose, once daily, in most trials
Kidneys
The label halves the dose in severe kidney impairment
Mixed vial
Not tested for long storage; mixed peptide does not keep
Every sourced dose row (6)
SourceDoseHow often and howWho it was forLink
FORZINITY prescribing information (FDA label)40 mg; 20 mg if eGFR is under 30 mL/min and not on dialysisUse this doseOnce daily, subcutaneous injectionAdults and children with Barth syndrome weighing at least 30 kg (approved use)Section 2.1 and 2.2 Dosage and Administration
TAZPOWER, Genet Med 202140 mgUse this doseOnce daily for 12 weeks versus placebo (crossover), then open-label extension at 40 mg per day12 people with Barth syndromeAbstract, Methods: 12 subjects randomized to 40 mg per day or placebo for 12 weeks
Karaa et al., J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020 (MMPOWER-2)40 mgUse this doseOnce daily subcutaneous for 4 weeks versus placebo for 4 weeks (crossover)30 adults with primary mitochondrial myopathyAbstract: 6-minute walk difference 19.8 m, P = 0.0833, primary endpoint not significant
Karaa et al., Neurology 2023 (MMPOWER-3)40 mgUse this doseOnce daily subcutaneous for 24 weeks versus placebo218 people with primary mitochondrial myopathyAbstract, Methods and Results: neither primary endpoint met
PROGRESS-HF, J Card Fail 20204 mg and 40 mg (two arms)Once daily subcutaneous for 28 days versus placebo71 people with heart failure with reduced ejection fractionAbstract: neither arm changed LV end-systolic volume versus placebo
ReCLAIM-2, Ophthalmol Sci 202540 mgUse this doseOnce daily subcutaneous for 48 weeks versus placebo176 people with dry age-related macular degeneration and geographic atrophyAbstract, Methods and Results: primary endpoints not met

Open the dose calculator

Watch it in 81 seconds

Claim, evidence, risk, grade. The same sourced facts as this page, no dose on screen.

Read the video

Low Battery. Today's charger: SS-31. Dave is tired, and his battery icon is in the red. He found SS-31. Cells run on tiny batteries called mitochondria. In cell studies, SS-31 sticks to a fat called cardiolipin in the mitochondria, and is claimed to steady its folds. That is a cell-study mechanism, not a result in people. SS-31, also called elamipretide, has a real FDA accelerated approval for muscle strength in Barth syndrome, an ultra-rare disease. That rests on eight people in an open-label extension. The randomized part did not beat placebo. In mitochondrial disease, a 218 person Phase 3 trial missed both main goals. For energy, recovery or longevity in healthy adults, there is no trial. Our grade for energy, recovery and longevity is D. For Barth syndrome the top grade is A, thanks to the FDA approval. It does not carry over to Dave. The scorecard. Grade D for healthy adults. No blood test tracks it, so you judge by how you function. Risks are on the label: serious allergic reactions and injection site reactions. FDA approved, for Barth syndrome only. A vial runs about ninety five dollars, our estimate. For Barth syndrome, a real drug. For a tired Dave, untested. Information, not medical advice.

How it might work

A picture of the idea, with the point where the evidence stops.

  1. SS-31 concentrates in the inner membrane of the mitochondrion

    Seen in the lab. Cell and animal studies

  2. It binds cardiolipin, a fat that shapes the inner folds

    Seen in the lab. Biochemical studies, several independent labs

  3. Folds stay steadier and less reactive waste leaks out

    Seen in the lab. Cell and animal data

  4. the evidence stops here

    More ATP: more energy and faster recovery

    Assumed, not shown in people. Not shown in healthy people. Missed both goals in mitochondrial disease.

Hypothesis, claim, or proven?

Hypothesis, lab only

  • Binds cardiolipin and steadies the mitochondrial folds (lab studies)
  • Cuts leaked reactive oxygen and supports ATP production (assumed)

Claimed, not tested in people

  • More energy, faster recovery, slower aging in healthy adults (grade D)
  • Clearer thinking, reported by some long-term users (not measured in any trial)

Tested in people

  • AImproves muscle strength and function in mitochondrial disease mixed
  • BSlows progression of geographic atrophy in dry age-related macular degeneration mixed
  • BImproves cardiac function and mitochondrial output in heart failure did not work

A tested use that missed its goal still counts toward the letter. Each claim's evidence is under "The trials, claim by claim" below.

Can you tell if it works, or if it hurts?

Is it working?

Nothing on a routine blood panel confirms SS-31 is working.

  • Trials measured function, not blood: 6-minute walk distance, fatigue scores, heart imaging, vision
  • If you try it, track how you feel and perform (fatigue, exercise tolerance), knowing a placebo effect cannot be ruled out

Is it hurting?

  • Eosinophils (a white blood cell count). The label notes a rise that peaks around 90 days and settles by 6 to 12 months.
  • Allergy signs the label lists. Rash, eczematous dermatitis, cough. Serious reactions can start within minutes to months of starting.

Not useful: Blood lactate only helps in people with diagnosed mitochondrial disease; GDF-15 and FGF-21 are research assays, not routine labs.

Risks, downside and placebo

Main risk: Injection-site reactions are the main effect; the label warns of serious hypersensitivity reactions, contraindicates use after one, and notes a rise in eosinophils.

Do not use if: The label contraindicates anyone with a prior serious hypersensitivity reaction to elamipretide.

Could it be placebo? No controlled trial for energy, recovery or longevity in healthy adults, so a placebo effect cannot be ruled out.

What went wrong for people

  • FDA labelSerious allergic reactions, including ones needing emergency treatment. The label bars use after one. FORZINITY prescribing information (DailyMed)
  • People reportItching and mild redness at the injection site for 30 to 60 minutes, reported by most community users who inject. It matches the trial side-effect pattern.
  • People reportA subset of community users report no effect at all, in line with the failed fatigue goal in mitochondrial disease.
  • Case studyA mixed vial left in the fridge for over two months had to be thrown out. Mixed peptide does not keep. Case study: the vial I kept too long

Reports from people are anecdote, not proof.

Team insights

One team member's running record is public: read the case study.

The full detail

Every trial, risk, source and date behind the page above.

Why it might work
  1. Mitochondrial membrane targeting
    SS-31 (D-Arg-Dmt-Lys-Phe-NH2) is a cel
  2. Cardiolipin binding
    Once localized
  3. Cristae stabilization and ROS reduction
    By stabilizing cardiolipin and its int
  4. ATP synthesis support (assumed)
    Downstream

Assumed pathway, not shown in people.

ASSUMED based on in vitro and animal data, partially supported in human disease populations. SS-31 is a cell-penetrating tetrapeptide (D-Arg-Dmt-Lys-Phe-NH2) that concentrates ~1000-fold in the inner mitochondrial membrane via electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. Once localized, it binds cardiolipin, a phospholipid critical for cristae architecture and electron transport chain supercomplex assembly. By stabilizing cardiolipin, SS-31 is theorized to preserve mitochondrial membrane potential, improve electron transfer efficiency, reduce reactive oxygen species production at complexes I and III, and support ATP synthesis. Whether this translates to meaningful functional improvement in humans without mitochondrial pathology is not established.

The trials, claim by claim

Failed trials still count toward the letter: MMPOWER-3, PROGRESS-HF and EMBRACE-STEMI were randomized and missed their main endpoints, and each result is shown in its own tag.

  • FDA approved for one ultra-rare cardiolipin disorder (Barth syndrome, Sept 2025), but the 218-person Phase 3 trial for the broader mitochondrial myopathy population missed both primary endpoints at 24 weeks.
  • The mechanism is the most solid part of the story: it really does bind cardiolipin in the inner mitochondrial membrane in biochemical studies, and cardiolipin really does matter for electron transport chain efficiency.
  • Published trials used 40 mg a day (and one 4 mg arm in heart failure), and the main trials in disease did not beat placebo. No verified dose statement exists for healthy users.
A

Improves muscle strength and function in mitochondrial disease

Result: mixed

FDA accelerated approval for Barth syndrome rests on knee extensor strength, which rose in the open-label extension (8 patients through week 168) but not in the 12-patient randomized crossover, which also failed its 6-minute walk and fatigue primary endpoints. MMPOWER-3 (n=218, primary mitochondrial myopathy) failed both primary endpoints at 24 weeks.

Efficacy and Safety of Elamipretide in PMM: MMPOWER-3 RCT (Neurology, 2023)
D

Stabilizes mitochondrial cristae structure by binding cardiolipin

Result: not tested in humans

Mechanism is well-characterized in biochemical and cell studies; cardiolipin binding and cristae stabilization confirmed across multiple independent laboratories. This is the strongest part of the evidence base, though functional consequences in humans remain uncertain beyond rare disease populations.

Elamipretide: Structure, Mechanism of Action, and Therapeutic Potential (IJMS, 2025, PMC11816484)
B

Slows progression of geographic atrophy in dry age-related macular degeneration

Result: mixed

ReCLAIM-2, a Phase II placebo-controlled trial (n=176), showed slowed ellipsoid zone loss (a surrogate endpoint) but did not demonstrate functional vision improvement. The Phase 3 ReNEW study (313 enrolled, primary endpoint photoreceptor-loss area at week 48) has finished enrolling, with a readout expected in late 2027.

ReCLAIM-2 Phase II AMD Trial (Ophthalmology Science, 2024, PMC11599447; PMID 39605874)
B

Improves cardiac function and mitochondrial output in heart failure

Result: did not work

Human cardiac trials exist and both failed their primary endpoints. PROGRESS-HF (n=71, HFrEF, 28 days) found no significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 4 weeks for either 4 mg or 40 mg vs placebo. EMBRACE-STEMI (Phase 2a, first-time anterior STEMI, primary PCI) found no decrease in myocardial infarct size vs placebo. A January 2026 rodent HFpEF study (PMC12841679) found elamipretide modestly improved complex I and II respiration but produced no functional or structural cardiac benefit once HFpEF was established, reinforcing the pattern of mechanistic signal without functional translation. Strong preclinical data in dog models of heart failure exist (PMC4743543) but cannot substitute for the failed human trial evidence. Graded B because a human randomized placebo-controlled trial exists for this use; the result is shown as did not work.

PROGRESS-HF Phase 2 Trial: no significant LVESV reduction (Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2020, PMID 32068002)
D

Boosts energy and reduces fatigue in healthy users or longevity-seeking adults

Result: not tested in humans

No efficacy trial exists in healthy adults. The only placebo-controlled study in older adults (n=39, one IV dose, PMID 34264994) enrolled people with poorly functioning muscle mitochondria and measured muscle ATP, not energy or recovery, and a 4-week Phase 2 study in healthy older adults (NCT07275424) is registered and recruiting. Community reports exist but no objective data. The MMPOWER-3 fatigue scale failed to separate from placebo even in patients with diagnosed mitochondrial disease.

Karaa et al., Neurology 2023, MMPOWER-3: failed fatigue primary endpoint (NCT03323749)
Status

The FORZINITY label warns of serious hypersensitivity reactions (including reactions needing emergency treatment), contraindicates use after one, and notes an eosinophil rise peaking around 90 days.

FDA-approved labeling.

FORZINITY prescribing information (DailyMed)
Status

A randomized confirmatory trial of elamipretide in Barth syndrome (NCT07531251, 4TAZPower) began in July 2026; continued approval depends on it.

Registry record and FDA approval statement.

NCT07531251, ClinicalTrials.gov
Risks and the label warnings

Adverse events

Injection site reactions are the dominant adverse event: 12 of 12 Barth patients (100 percent) versus 8 of 12 on placebo in the label trial, and up to 86% of elamipretide-treated participants vs 71% placebo in ReCLAIM-2. Reactions include pruritus, pain, bruising, and erythema at the injection site. Mild headache and nausea reported in a minority. The approved label warns of hypersensitivity reactions, including serious allergic reactions needing emergency treatment (rash, eczematous dermatitis, cough), which can appear within minutes to months of starting. Eosinophil counts rise for about 3 months and settle by 6 to 12 months. Published Phase 1/2 trials (MMPOWER-3, TAZPOWER, PROGRESS-HF, EMBRACE-STEMI, ReCLAIM-2) reported no deaths and no other serious systemic effects attributed to the drug. ECG, vital signs, and serum chemistry showed no clinically significant changes attributable to elamipretide across trials. 168-week TAZPOWER OLE added no new safety signals.

Contraindications

The label contraindicates anyone with a prior serious hypersensitivity reaction to elamipretide. It is not approved for neonates (the vial contains benzyl alcohol) or for intravenous use. Use in pregnancy, lactation, and severe renal or hepatic failure is not well characterized. Compounded peptide sources carry additional sterility and purity risks not present in the pharmaceutical formulation.

Theoretical concerns

Cardiolipin modulation affects multiple mitochondrial processes including apoptosis signaling; theoretical concern that systemic cardiolipin stabilization could interfere with normal programmed cell death in rapidly dividing cells (immune cells, gut epithelium). Not observed in trials to date but long-term data beyond 4 years is limited even in disease populations.

What nobody knows yet

Long-term effects (beyond 3-4 years) in humans are unknown. Effects in healthy adults with normal mitochondrial function are not studied. Optimal dosing, cycling, and duration for any off-label purpose are entirely undefined by controlled data. A 2026 rodent HFpEF study found mechanistic improvement in mitochondrial respiration that did not translate into functional cardiac benefit, raising the question of whether the mechanism alone is sufficient to produce clinical endpoints in established disease states.

What else could explain the result

Wellness users who report energy and recovery improvements are almost always also on TRT, GLP-1 agonists, or peptide stacks (BPC-157, CJC-1295, TB-500). TRT alone substantially improves mitochondrial density and energy. GLP-1 agonists reduce inflammatory fat mass which improves baseline energy. Stacking SS-31 on top of these makes attribution essentially impossible. Community reports should be read with this baseline-effect lens.

Is the vial what it says?

Compiled from the cited sources below. Where no completed human trial exists, the grade says so.

Half-life and storage

Half-life: Approximately 2 hours plasma half-life after subcutaneous injection, based on pharmacokinetic data from Phase 1 dose-escalation study. Mitochondrial dwell time may exceed plasma half-life due to preferential accumulation in mitochondrial membrane.

Once mixed: Lyophilized SS-31 is relatively stable if stored frozen and protected from light. Reconstituted solution should be used within 24 hours if refrigerated; not validated for extended storage after reconstitution. The dipeptide tyrosine analog (2-prime-6-prime-dimethyltyrosine) is susceptible to oxidation; antioxidant-free reconstitution with bacteriostatic water is the standard practice in compounded formulations.

What I noticed, and what people report

Case study

What people report

Volume of reports: mixed. Reports exist but contradict each other.

Moderate community discussion in longevity and biohacker forums (Reddit r/Peptides, Longecity, various wellness blogs). Volume has grown significantly since FDA approval in 2025 gave it mainstream legitimacy.

Inconsistent. Reports of improved energy and recovery are common but highly variable. A subset of users report nothing. The pattern mirrors what you would expect from a peptide with a real mechanism but uncertain human efficacy outside specific disease states.

Low to moderate. Most community reports come from people also on TRT or other compounds. No n-of-1 well-controlled biohacker reports exist. The clinical trial failure in PMM patients (a population with actual mitochondrial dysfunction) suggests healthy-user effects are likely smaller or absent.

  • Anecdote: users commonly report a subtle but noticeable increase in stamina and reduced workout recovery time within 2 to 4 weeks, though this is nearly impossible to separate from concurrent TRT or BPC-157 use.
  • Anecdote: a subset of biohacker forum users report no perceptible effect at the low doses they use, consistent with the clinical trial fatigue data showing no separation from placebo even at 40 mg/day in disease populations.
  • Anecdote: several long-term users (6+ months) describe subjective cognitive clarity improvements, which is not a studied endpoint in any trial and is highly susceptible to expectation effect.
  • Anecdote: injection site itching and mild redness lasting 30 to 60 minutes is reported by a majority of community users who inject subcutaneously, matching the clinical trial adverse event profile closely.

Reports are anecdote, not proof.

Can you tell if it is working?

Not trackable

No blood proxy and no individually verifiable readout exist for SS-31; VO2max/CPET is the only mechanism-appropriate axis but is not validated in any relevant human population and sits below individual test-retest noise.

Bloodwork

No blood proxy

Nothing on a routine panel confirms this one. Anyone who says otherwise is guessing.

SS-31 (elamipretide) acts entirely inside the cell at the inner mitochondrial membrane, it binds cardiolipin, stabilizes cristae, improves electron-transport efficiency, and lowers ROS. It creates or alters no circulating hormone or routine serum analyte, so its biological action leaves no fingerprint on a standard blood panel.

Read this before you spend on labs

Routine bloodwork cannot confirm SS-31 is working. Its effect is intracellular mitochondrial function, which no orderable LabCorp/Quest analyte tracks. The pivotal human trials measured functional endpoints (6-minute walk distance, fatigue scores, cardiac imaging, vision), not a blood biomarker, and the phase-3 MMPOWER-3 trial missed both co-primary endpoints; serum chemistry showed no changes attributable to the drug. The one routine near-proxy, blood lactate, is only informative in patients with documented mitochondrial disease and a pathologically elevated baseline (it is normal, and therefore uninformative, in healthy users), and it was never validated as an elamipretide-responsive marker. The actual emerging mitochondrial-disease biomarkers, GDF-15 and FGF-21, are specialized/research assays, not routine bloodwork, so they do not count. If you use SS-31, track it by how you feel and function (fatigue, exercise tolerance), not by a lab draw.

Other ways to track it

VO2maxNo signal

Lab CPET (graded treadmill or cycle ergometer) for measured peak VO2, gold standard. Consumer wearable VO2max estimate (Garmin/Apple Watch/COROS, derived from heart-rate vs. pace on steady outdoor runs) is a rough, noisier fallback.

SS-31 targets skeletal-muscle and cardiac mitochondrial oxidative capacity, so maximal aerobic capacity is the axis it would move IF it works, which is why VO2max is the only mechanism-matched candidate. But it is not individually verifiable for this compound. The heart-failure and heart-attack trials missed their primary endpoints (PROGRESS-HF in HFrEF, n=71; EMBRACE-STEMI). The mitochondrial-myopathy RCT (MMPOWER-3) was flat, and the only placebo-controlled older-adult study (people with muscle mitochondrial dysfunction) needed research-grade 31P-MRS to catch a transient ATPmax rise that produced no fatigue benefit and was gone by day 7. Any effect this small is inside individual CPET test-retest noise (~2-3 mL/kg/min) and is easily manufactured or erased by small training changes. A healthy self-experimenter should expect no interpretable change, and any change they see cannot be attributed to the compound. No magnitude can be promised.

Cardiolipin stabilization on the inner mitochondrial membrane is proposed to improve electron-transport efficiency and lower ROS, which in principle raises maximal oxidative ATP flux and therefore VO2max. In humans this mechanism has produced at most a small, non-replicating, disease-population signal, so the readout is directionally right but effectively unverifiable at the individual level.

If tracked at all: baseline CPET before starting, retest after ~8-12 weeks of consistent dosing, holding training load and body weight constant so conditioning does not masquerade as a drug effect. A wearable estimate needs several weeks of consistent runs to stabilize and is even more confounded by training. Treat any result as hypothesis-generating, not confirmatory.How to do it right

Bottom line

SS-31 (elamipretide) has no blood proxy and no validated, individually verifiable efficacy readout on any consumer or clinical tool. Its human trials in mitochondrial myopathy, heart failure (PROGRESS-HF, HFrEF), acute MI, and dry AMD largely missed functional endpoints, and the only placebo-controlled older-adult study needed research-grade 31P-MR spectroscopy to detect a transient, non-functional mitochondrial blip gone within a week. VO2max/CPET is the only mechanism-appropriate axis, but for a healthy user it is not verifiable: any true effect is smaller than individual test-retest noise and is swamped by training. Do not expect a wearable, CGM, DEXA, sleep, urine, or stool readout to confirm this one, and treat any perceived energy or fatigue benefit as subjective and unverified.

Logging baseline vs retest is the whole game. The Truth Tracker is our free log for bloodwork, DEXA, genetics, and wearable data, bring your own numbers.

How to track it
History

First documented human use: Circa 2013-2015, Phase I/II dose-escalation safety study in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy, sponsored by Stealth BioTherapeutics. The trial number NCT01786941 and the 2010 start date cited in some sources could not be independently confirmed against the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and should be treated as unverified; the SPIMM-201 Phase 1/2 IV-dose study is the earliest published human dataset.

  1. Early 2000sDrs. Hazel Szeto and Peter Schiller at Cornell University develop the SS peptide series (Szeto-Schiller), identifying SS-31 as a cell-penetrating tetrapeptide that selectively accumulates in mitochondria via cardiolipin binding.
  2. 2006Hazel Szeto founds Stealth BioTherapeutics to advance SS-31 (initially called Bendavia, later MTP-131) toward clinical development.
  3. 2016EMBRACE-STEMI Phase 2a trial (PMID 26586786) published in European Heart Journal: IV elamipretide in first-time anterior STEMI patients undergoing PCI found no decrease in myocardial infarct size vs placebo.
  4. 2018-2023Phase 1/2 MMPOWER study shows early promise in mitochondrial myopathy. Phase 3 MMPOWER-3 enrolls 218 patients; results released 2023 show failure on both primary endpoints (6-minute walk test and fatigue scale).
  5. 2020PROGRESS-HF Phase 2 trial (PMID 32068002) published in Journal of Cardiac Failure: 71 HFrEF patients randomized to placebo, 4 mg, or 40 mg elamipretide for 28 days; no significant improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 4 weeks.
  6. September 2025FDA grants accelerated approval to FORZINITY (elamipretide HCl) for Barth syndrome in patients weighing at least 30 kg, the first FDA-approved mitochondria-targeted therapeutic. Approval rests on knee extensor strength, an intermediate endpoint; continued approval contingent on confirmatory trial results.
  7. July 2026The randomized confirmatory trial 4TAZPower (NCT07531251, Phase 4) begins recruiting.
All sources

Not medical advice. Grades reflect the evidence as of the date above and will change as data arrives. Reports from users are anecdote, not proof. Talk to a licensed clinician before you act on anything here.